4.6 Review

Integrative physiology and functional genomics of epithelial function in a genetic model organism

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 687-729

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [S19561] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [S19561] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classically, biologists try to understand their complex systems by simplifying them to a level where the problem is tractable, typically moving from whole animal and organ-level biology to the immensely powerful cellular and molecular approaches. However, the limitations of this reductionist approach are becoming apparent, leading to calls for a new, integrative physiology. Rather than use the term as a rallying cry for classical organismal physiology, we have defined it as the study of how gene products integrate into the function of whole tissues and intact organisms. From this viewpoint, the convergence between integrative physiology and functional genomics becomes clear; both seek to understand gene function in an organismal context, and both draw heavily on transgenics and genetics in genetic models to achieve their goal. This convergence between historically divergent fields provides powerful leverage to those physiologists who can phrase their research questions in a particular way. In particular, the use of appropriate genetic model organisms provides a wealth of technologies (of which microarrays and knock-outs are but two) that allow a new precision in physiological analysis. We illustrate this approach with an epithelial model system, the Malpighian ( renal) tubule of Drosophila melanogaster. With the use of the beautiful genetic tools and extensive genomic resources characteristic of this genetic model, it has been possible to gain unique insights into the structure, function, and control of epithelia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据