4.7 Article

Mixing of the intestinal content and variations of fermentation capacity do not affect the results of hydrogen breath test

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 98, 期 7, 页码 1584-1587

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9270(03)00373-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Although the hydrogen (H-2) breath test has been in use for many years for diagnosis of sugar malabsorption, research is still underway to improve its diagnostic accuracy. In this study, we investigated whether possible confusing factors caused by the ingestion of the test solution itself (such as the delivery to the colon of other fermentable substrates pre-existing in the small bowel lumen, the release of preformed H-2 trapped in the feces, or differences in the fermenting capacity of the colonic bacteria) may interfere with the increase of breath H-2 concentration, an expression of malabsorption of the test substrate. METHODS: In 25 patients with untreatedceliac disease and 23 sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers, breath H-2 excretion was measured after ingestion of a 250-ml solution containing sorbitol, a poorly absorbed alcohol sugar. On 2 other separate days, 12 randomly selected subjects in each group underwent breath H-2 excretion measurement after ingestion of 250 ml of a sugar free, nonabsorbable electrolyte solution and 250 ml of a solution containing lactulose, a nonabsorbable disaccharide. RESULTS: After sorbitol ingestion, celiac disease patients showed a significantly higher breath H-2 excretion than did healthy volunteers. Otherwise, breath H-2 responses to electrolyte solution and lactulose showed no difference between the two groups of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of patients with sugar malabsorption, increased breath H-2 excretion does reflect malabsorption. The washout or the rnixing of the intestinal content or intergroup difference of fermenting activity of the colonic bacteria do not represent interfering factors and do not modify the accuracy of the H-2 breath test in day-to-day clinical practice. (C) 2003 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据