4.5 Article

Constraints on the surface composition of Trojan asteroids from near-infrared (0.8-4.0 μm) spectroscopy

期刊

ICARUS
卷 164, 期 1, 页码 104-121

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00143-X

关键词

asteroids, composition; infrared observations; organic chemistry; spectroscopy; surfaces, asteroids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present new near-infrared spectra of 20 Trojan asteroids. The spectra were recorded at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) using the recently commissioned medium-resolution spectrograph SpeX and at the Multiple Mirror Telescope (MMT) using the instrument FSPEC. Spectra of all of these objects were measured in K-band (1.95-2.5 mum), 8 of these in L-band (2.8-4.0 mum), and 14 in the range 0.8-2.5 mum. These observations nearly double the number of published 0.8-2.5 mum spectra of Trojan asteroids and provide the first systematic study of the L-band region for these distant asteroids. The data show that the red spectral slope measured in the near-IR extends through the L-band, though it is not as steep here as at shorter wavelengths. A significant diversity is apparent in the near-IR spectral slopes of this sampling of objects. Most of the spectra do not contain any definitive absorption features characteristic of surface composition (e.g., H2O, organics, silicates) as seen on main-belt asteroids and several Centaur and Kuiper Belt objects. A few objects may display spectral activity, and the reliability of these possible features is discussed. While these spectra are generally compatible with silicate surfaces to explain the spectral slope mixed with some fraction of low albedo material, there is no absolute indication of silicates. The spectral slope could also be explained by the presence of hydrocarbons, but the lack of absorption features, especially in L-band where very strong fundamental absorptions from these molecules appear, constrains the character and abundance of these materials at the surface. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据