4.4 Article

Identification of Trypanosoma brucei circulating in a sleeping sickness focus in Cote d'Ivoire: assessment of genotype selection by the isolation method

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 143-149

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1567-1348(03)00069-8

关键词

Trypanosoma brucei; Isoenzyme electrophoresis; Kit for In Vitro Isolation (KIVI); Rodent inoculation; Animal reservoir; Cote d'Ivoire

资金

  1. Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD)
  2. Agence Francaise de la Francophonie (AUF)
  3. French Ministere de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic studies of Trypanosoma brucei have been mainly based on rodent inoculation (RI) for isolation of trypanosome strains. However, Trypanosoma brucei gambiense is difficult to grow in rodents. The development and use of the Kit for In Vitro Isolation (KIVI) of trypanosomes has led to a better isolation success. However, some authors report a genetic monomorphism in T.b. gambiense, and the extensive use of the KIVI was suspected as being responsible for this low genetic diversity. In the present work, trypanosome stocks were isolated from both humans and pigs in an active sleeping sickness focus in Cote d'Ivoire. Two methods were simultaneously used for this purpose: KIVI and rodent inoculation. None of the human stocks grew in rodents. Some of the stocks originating from pigs could be isolated with both methods. Each of these stocks (from the same pig) showed a different isoenzymatic pattern according to the isolation method used. All the human stocks identified belonged to the major zymodeme 3 of T. b. gambiense group 1, whereas the stocks isolated from pigs belonged to a new group of zymodemes even if they were genetically closely related. These observations may have significant implications when analysing the population structure of T. brucei, and also raise again the question of the importance of the animal reservoir in Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT). (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据