4.4 Article

Decreased pigment epithelium-derived factor and increased vascular endothelial growth factor levels in pterygia

期刊

CORNEA
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 473-477

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200307000-00015

关键词

angiogenesis; conjunctiva; corneal epithelium; growth factor; immunocytochemistry

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY12600] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. Pterygia are histologically composed of proliferating fibrovascular tissue. This study compared expression levels of an angiogenic inhibitor, pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), in pterygia with those in normal corneal and conjunctival tissues. Methods. The normal human conjunctival and corneal tissues were obtained from surgery or from donor eyes without ocular diseases. Pterygia were excised by therapeutic surgery under a microscope. Pigment epithelium-derived factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured by Western blot analysis. Their cellular localizations were determined by immunohistochemistry. Results. Intensive PEDF immunostaining was detected in all the normal corneal and conjunctival samples analyzed, predominantly in the epithelium and endothelium of the cornea and in the epithelium of the limbus and conjunctiva. Under the same immunostaining conditions, pterygial samples showed negative or faint PEDF staining. In contrast, the same pterygial samples all showed intensive VEGF staining, predominantly in the epithelium and in blood vessels. Western blot analysis confirmed that the average PEDF level in pterygia was drastically lower than those in normal corneal and conjunctival tissues, respectively. In contrast, the VEGF level in pterygia was significantly higher than in the normal tissues. Conclusion. Pterygia exhibit significantly lower PEDF but higher VEGF levels than those in normal corneas and conjunctivae. The decreased PEDF level in pterygia may play a role in the formation and progression of pterygia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据