4.7 Article

A cross-sectional study of alcohol consumption patterns and biologic markers of glycemic control among 459 women

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 1971-1978

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.7.1971

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Little research has explored associations of drinking patterns with glycemic control, especially among women. Our objective was to determine the relationship of patterns of alcohol consumption-including average daily consumption, weekly frequency of consumption, drinking with meals, and beverage type-with biologic markers of insulin resistance m young women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This study was cross-sectional in design. The subjects consisted of a stratified random subpopulation of 459 U.S. normal-weight and over-weight female nurses, 33-50 years of age, drawn from the Nurses' Health Study 11 and sampled for distinct drinking patterns. Women provided blood samples and detailed information on dietary and lifestyle factors between 1995 and 1999. The main outcome measures were fasting insulin, C-peptide, and HbA, c. RESULTS - Adjusting for age, smoking, physical activity, television watching, BMI, and several dietary factors, average alcohol intake was inversely associated with HbA,c (units in percentage of HbA,,): 0 g/day (reference = 5.36%), 0.1 to <5.0 g/day (-0.04%), 5.0 to <15.0 g/day (-0.09%), 15.0 to <25.0 g/day (-0.10%), and greater than or equal to25.0 g/day (-0.17%) (P value, test for trend <0.001). We found an inverse association of alcohol intake and insulin, but only for women with a BMI greater than or equal to25 kg/m(2). Specifically, insulin levels were lowest for episodic drinkers consuming greater than or equal to2 drinks per day on 0-3 days per week. Consumption with meals and type of alcoholic beverage did not further influence these results. CONCLUSIONS - Moderate alcohol consumption of 1-2 drinks per day on a few to several days of the week may have a beneficial glycemic effect, particularly among over-weight women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据