4.7 Article

The rapid induction of glutathione S-transferases AtGSTF2 and AtGSTF6 by avirulent Pseudomonas syringae is the result of combined salicylic acid and ethylene signaling

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 7, 页码 750-757

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcg093

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; Pseudomonas syringae; crosstalk; sensitivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression of two members of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) multigene family was studied in Arabidopsis plants inoculated with an avirulent strain of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst). Accumulation of AtGSTF2 and AtGSTF6 transcripts started 4 and 2 It after inoculation, respectively, and clearly preceded the induction of the pathogenesis-related PR-1 gene. The aim of this work was to find the reason for the faster induction of the two GSTs compared with classical salicylic acid (SA)-regulated]PR-proteins. Expression studies in Pst-inoculated SA-signaling mutants NahG and npr1 revealed that induction of both GSTs was SA-dependent and partially NPR1-independent. The induction of AtGSTF2 by Pst was also strongly repressed in the ethylene insensitive etr1 mutant. Both GSTs were induced by low amounts of SA (0.1 mM) and ethylene (0.1 ppm) while PR-1 gene expression was unaffected by ethylene. Interestingly, ethylene was about 50-fold less effective in NahG compared with wild-type plants thus suggesting a potentiation effect of SA on ethylene-induced accumulation of AtGST transcripts. Increased AtGST expression in plants inoculated with Pst correlated with increased production of SA and ethylene. However, the initial phase of AtGSTF6 induction was independent of SA- and ethylene-signaling. The jasmonate (JA)-insensitive mutant jar1 showed normal induction kinetics for both GSTs. Our data support the hypothesis that full expression of the pathogen-induced AtGSTF2 and, to a lesser extent AtGSTF6, is the result of combined SA- and ethylene-signaling and that early AtGSTF6 expression depends on additional unknown signaling mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据