4.5 Article

Alterations in TGF-β1 expression in lambs with increased pulmonary blood flow and pulmonary hypertension

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00171.2002

关键词

shunted lambs

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-61284, HL-67841, R01 HL054705, HL-60190] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-398110] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms responsible for pulmonary vascular remodeling in congenital heart disease with increased pulmonary blood flow remain unclear. We developed a lamb model of congenital heart disease and increased pulmonary blood flow utilizing an in utero placed aortopulmonary vascular graft (shunted lambs). Morphometric analysis of barium-injected pulmonary arteries indicated that by 4 wk of age, shunts had twice the pulmonary arterial density of controls (P<0.05), and their pulmonary vessels showed increased muscularization and medial thickness at both 4 and 8 wk of age (P<0.05). To determine the potential role of TGF-beta1 in this vascular remodeling, we investigated vascular changes in expression and localization of TGF-beta1 and its receptors TbetaRI, ALK-1, and TbetaRII in lungs of shunted and control lambs at 1 day and 1, 4, and 8 wk of life. Western blots demonstrated that TGF-beta1 and ALK-1 expression was elevated in shunts compared with control at 1 and 4 wk of age (P<0.05). In contrast, the antiangiogenic signaling receptor T beta RI was decreased at 4 wk of age (P<0.05). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated shunts had increased TGF-beta1 and TbetaRI expression in smooth muscle layer and increased TGF-beta1 and ALK-1 in endothelium of small pulmonary arteries at 1 and 4 wk of age. Moreover, TbetaRI expression was significantly reduced in endothelium of pulmonary arteries in the shunt at 1 and 4 wk. Our data suggest that increased pulmonary blood flow dysregulates TGF-beta1 signaling, producing imbalance between pro- and antiangiogenic signaling that may be important in vascular remodeling in shunted lambs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据