4.6 Article

Inverse relationship between Skp2 ubiquitin ligase and the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 in prostate cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 170, 期 1, 页码 241-245

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000072113.34524.a7

关键词

prostate; prostatic neoplasms; ubiquitin; cyclin-dependent kinases; biopsy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Prostate carcinomas show a low level of the cell cycle inhibitor p27, which correlates with tumor aggressiveness. In tumors p27 is of the WT species and its deregulation is due to aberrant ubiquitin mediated degradation. The p27 is degraded following phosphorylation and subsequent recognition by SCFSkp2 ubiquitin ligase. We examined the relationship between p27 and its specific ligase Skp2 in normal and malignant prostate tissues. A possible correlation among the levels of these proteins, tumor grading and clinical state was also investigated. Materials and Methods: Using immunohistochemistry immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis 51 samples from needle biopsies, transurethral resection and radical prostatectomy were analyzed for p27 and Skp2 expression. Correlation with tumor grading (Gleason) was performed. In 22 proven metastatic or organ confined cases correlation was also done with the Ki67 proliferative marker. Results: Skp2 expression demonstrated a significant and direct correlation with malignancy (p <0.0001). Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between Skp2 level and tumor aggressiveness graded by Gleason score (p <0.0002) and prostate specific antigen. Patients with metastases had significantly higher Skp2 and Ki67 expression than those with organ confined disease (P <0.0001). In addition, Skp2 levels significantly correlated with Ki67 (r = 0.73, p <0.0001). An inverse correlation was found between p27 and Skp2 ligase. Conclusions: Skp2 expression in prostate biopsies may be used as an additional marker for tumor aggressiveness. The results also suggest a role for Skp2 in the pathogenesis of prostate malignancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据