4.7 Article

β-phenylethyl isothiocyanate-mediated apoptosis in hepatoma HepG2 cells

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 60, 期 7, 页码 1489-1503

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-003-3150-4

关键词

apoptosis; cell cycle arrest; beta-phenylethyl isothiocyanate; oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-Phenylethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) is a promising chemoprotective compound that is routinely consumed in the diet as its glucosinolate precursor. Previous studies have shown that PEITC can inhibit phase I enzymes and induce phase II detoxification enzymes along with apoptosis in vitro. The detailed mechanisms involved in the apoptotic cascade, however, have not been elucidated. In the present study, we demonstrate that PEITC can induce apoptosis in hepatoma HepG2 cells in a concentration- and time-dependant manner as determined by TUNEL positive and SubG1 population analysis. Caspase-3-like activity and poly(ADP-ribosyl)polymerase cleavage increased during treatment with 20 muM PEITC; high concentrations, however, induced necrosis. Pre-treatment with Z-VAD-FMK and the caspase-3-specific inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO prevented PEITC-induced apoptosis, as determined by caspase-3-like activity and DNA fragmentation. Additional investigations also showed that at concentrations of 5 - 10 muM PEITC, DNA synthesis was inhibited and G2/M phase cell cycle arrest occurred, correlating with an alteration in cyclin B1 and p34(cdc2) protein levels. Furthermore, we also demonstrate a concentration- and time-dependant burst of superoxide (O-2(.-)) in PEITC-treated cells. However, pre- and co-treatment with the free radical scavengers Trolox, ascorbate, mannitol, uric acid and the superoxide mimetic manganese (III) tetrakis (N-methyl-2-pyridyl) porphyrin failed to prevent PEITC-mediated apoptosis. Taken together, these results suggest that PEITC potently induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in HepG2 cells and that the generation of reactive oxygen species appears to be a secondary effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据