4.1 Article

Endoglin (CD105) expression in endometrial carcinoma

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.PGP.0000070852.25718.37

关键词

endometrial cancer; hyperplasia; angiogenesis; endoglin; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor angiogenesis plays an important role in tumor growth and metastasis. We evaluated endoglin (CD105) as an endothelial marker of angiogenesis in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and its prognostic significance. Fifty-five cases of EC, 10 cases of complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia (CHA), and 10 cases of simple hyperplasia (SH) were immunohistochemically stained for endoglin, CD31, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Positively stained microvessels (MV) were counted in densely vascular foci (hot spots) in a 400x field in each specimen. For VEGF, intensity of staining was scored on three-tiered scale. Results were correlated with other prognostic parameters using appropriate statistics. Endoglin staining demonstrated significantly more MV than did CD31 (mean 30.8 + 10.95 vs. 13.38 + 7.53, p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation of both endoglin and CD31 MV counts with tumor differentiation (p < 0.05) and the depth of invasion (p < 0.01). However, only endoglin counts correlated significantly with the presence of angiolymphatic invasion (p < 0.01), lymph nodes metastases (p < 0.01), and tumor stage (p < 0.001). VEGF expression in EC had a significant correlation with angiolymphatic invasion (p < 0.01) and lymph node status (p < 0.05) but not with other prognostic parameters. Endoglin and VEGF showed significant differences between CHA and SH (p < 0.001). Our study showed that endoglin, by staining the proliferating MV in EC, is a more specific and sensitive marker for tumor angiogenesis than is the commonly used pan-endothelial marker, CD31. Endoglin staining also had prognostic significance, with positive correlation with angiolymphatic invasion, lymph node metastases, and tumor stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据