4.6 Article

Balance and mobility performance as treatable risk factors for recurrent falling in older persons

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 659-668

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00082-9

关键词

accidental falls; aged; cohort studies; exercise; risk factors; postural sway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine whether easily measurable measures for balance and muscle strength predicted recurrent falling as well as sophisticated measurements, and to examine which of the modifiable risk factors were strongest associated with recurrent falling. Methods: The study was performed in a subsample (n = 439, aged 69-92 years) of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). Balance, muscle strength, physical activity, and performance tests were assessed. Falls were recorded during I year. The outcome measure was recurrent falls (greater than or equal to falls within I year). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of mediolateral sway (AUC = 0.67; 95% CI:0.57-0.77), tandem stand (AUC = 0.61; 95% CI:0.49-0.73), leg extension strength (AUC = 0.58; 95% CI:0.51-0.64), and handgrip strength (AUC = 0.57; 95% CI:0.51-0.64) for recurrent falling were not significantly different. In a multivariate model, mediolateral sway (OR = 2.8; 95% CI:1.1-6.9), tandem stand (OR = 2.1: 95% CI: 1.1-3.8), and walking test (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.1) were significantly associated with recurrent falling. Conclusions: The easily measurable tandem stand and handgrip strength predicted recurrent falling as well as the sophisticated measures. Mediolateral sway was strongest associated with recurrent falling. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据