4.6 Article

Gene expression in human neutrophils during activation and priming by bacterial lipopolysaccharide

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 848-861

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.10526

关键词

adhesion; chemokine; granulocyte; interleukin; microarray; myeloid; NF-kappa beta; toll-like receptor; tumor necrosis factor

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01-DK54369] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating neutrophils play a key role both in the systemic inflammatory response and in complications of bacterial infection such as septic shock and septic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. We have analyzed gene expression patterns in human neutrophils stimulated by E coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), with or without prior exposure to LIPS, using differential display and oligonucleotide chip techniques. We identified 307 genes that were activated or repressed after treatment with LPS at 10 ng/ml and 385 genes after LPS at 100 ng/ml, compared with untreated neutrophils. The two sets included many transcription factors, cytokines, chemokines, interleukins, and surface antigens, as well as members of the toll-like receptor, Rel/NF-kappaB, and immune mediator gene families. Time course analysis showed that the early and late neutrophil responses to LPS share some common mechanisms, but many changes in gene expression are transient or late to develop. Neutrophils also showed a priming response to LPS, in which 97 genes significantly changed expression on re-exposure to lower dose LIPS and were analyzed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. These findings indicate that the neutrophil is a transcriptionally active cell responsive to environmental stimuli and capable of a complex series of both early and late changes in gene expression. Supplementary material for this article can be found on the journal of Cellular Biochemistry website (http://jws-edci.interscience.wiley.com:8998/jpages/0730-2312/suppmat/89/ v89.page.html). (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据