4.5 Article

Modifications of myosin-regulatory light chain correlate with function of stunned myocardium

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2828(03)00141-X

关键词

myocardium; ischemia and reperfusion; myosin-regulatory light chain; protein degradation; proteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The precise molecular basis for myocardial stunning remains unresolved, but protein damage within the myofibril is a likely mechanism. We used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry (MS) to identify protein modifications in stunned myocardium. In isolated, perfused rabbit hearts, low-flow ischemia (1 ml/min) and reperfusion resulted in impaired left-ventricular function (rate-pressure product (RPP) after 15-min ischemia: 65 +/- 5% pre-ischemia). We have characterised the sequence of ventricular myosin-regulatory light chain (MLC-2, 18 kDa) in rabbit myocardium and identified two non-phosphorylated (P-1 and P-2) and two phosphorylated (P-3 and P-4 at Ser-14) isoelectric point variants. MS revealed that the acidic isoelectric point post-translational modification of P, and P, resulting in P-2 and P-4 respectively, was due to deamidation of asparagine to aspartate at residue 13, adjacent to Ser-14 phosphorylation site. After 15-min ischemia and reperfusion, a 15-kDa MLC-2 fragment was detected (MLC-2(14-165)), resulting from N-terminal cleavage between Asn/Asp-13 and Ser-14 of non-phosphorylated MLC-2, which accounted for 9.8% of visible non-phosphorylated MLC-2. Subsequent 2-DE of subcellular fractions showed that the fragment was lost from the myofilament. Treatment with an OH radical scavenger, N-(2-mercaptopropionyl) glycine (MPG, 3 mmol/l), preserved contractile function (RPP: 106 +/- 9% pre-ischemia) and prevented cleavage of MLC-2. Proteolytic damage to MLC-2, related to presence of OH radicals during reperfusion, correlates with myocardial stunning and may contribute to impaired contractility. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据