4.6 Article

Acute tubular injury causes dysregulation of cellular cholesterol transport proteins

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 163, 期 1, 页码 313-320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63655-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK038432, R01 DK-38432, R01 DK 54200, R37 DK038432] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute renal injury causes accumulation of free and esterified cholesterol (FC, CE) in proximal tubules, mediated, at least in part, by increased cholesterol synthesis. Normally, this would trigger compensatory mechanisms such as increased efflux and decreased influx to limit or reverse the cholesterol overload state. This study sought to determine the integrity of these compensatory pathways following acute renal damage. Rhabdomyolysis-induced acute renal failure was induced in mice by glycerol injection. Normal mice served as controls. After 18 hours, BUN levels and renal cortical FC/CE content were determined. Expression of ABCA-1 and SR-B1 (cholesterol efflux proteins) were assessed by Western blot. Renal cortical IDL receptor (LDL-R; a cholesterol importer) regulation was gauged by quantifying its mRNA. To obtain proximal tubule cell-specific data, the impact of oxidant (Fe) stress on cultured HK-2 cell LDL-R, SR-B1, and ABCA-1 proteins and their niRNAs (versus controls) was assessed. Glycerol evoked marked azotemia and striking FC/CE increments (44%, 384%, respectively). Paradoxically, renal cortical SR-B1 and ABCA-1 protein reductions and LDL-R mRNA increments resulted. Fe-induced injury suppressed HK-2 cell SR-B1, ABCA-1, and their mRNAs. LDL-R protein rose with the in vitro Fe challenge. Renal tubular cell injury causes dysregulation of SR-B1, ABCA-1, and LDL-R protein expression, changes which should contribute to a cholesterol overload state. Reductions in HK-2 cell SR-B1 and ABCA-1 mRNAs and increases in renal cortical LDL-R mRNA imply that this dysregulation reflects, at least in part, altered genomic/transcriptional events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据