4.6 Article

Kinetic analysis of binding interaction between the subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus glycoprotein SU and its cognate receptor Tva: Calcium is not required for ligand binding

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 77, 期 13, 页码 7517-7526

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7517-7526.2003

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA092459, R01 CA070810, CA70810, R01 CA092459] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI48056] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM54414, R01 GM054414] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tva is the receptor for subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus, and it contains a single LDL-A module which is the site of virus interaction. In this study, we expressed the entire extracellular region of Tva (referred to as Ecto-Tva) as a GST fusion protein and characterized its refolding properties. We demonstrated that the correct folding of the Ecto-Tva protein, like that of the Tva LDL-A module, is calcium dependent. We used the IAsys system to measure the kinetics of binding between the surface (SU) subunit of the viral glycoprotein and Tva in real time. We found that the Ecto-Tva protein and the Tva LDL-A module displayed similar affinities for SU, providing direct evidence that the LDL-A module of Tva is the only viral interaction domain of the receptor. Furthermore, misfolded Tva proteins displayed lower binding affinities to SU, largely due to a decrease in their association rates, suggesting that a high association rate between SU and Tva is crucial for efficient virus-host interaction. Furthermore, we found that calcium did not influence the overall binding affinity between Tva and SU. These results indicate that, although calcium is important in facilitating correct folding of the LDL-A module of Tva, it is not essential for ligand binding. Thus, these results may have broad implications for the mechanism of protein folding and ligand recognition of the LDL receptor and other members of the LDL receptor superfamily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据