4.4 Review

Cardiac tissue engineering for replacement therapy

期刊

HEART FAILURE REVIEWS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 259-269

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024725818835

关键词

tissue engineering; replacement therapy; cardiac myocytes; stem cells; engineered heart tissue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell therapy is a new concept to repair diseased organs. For patients with myocardial infarction, heart failure, and congenital heart diseases cell based therapies might represent a potential cure. The field can be subdivided into two principally different approaches: (1) Implantation of isolated cells and (2) implantation of ire vitro engineered tissue constructs. This review will focus on the latter approach. Cardiac tissue engineering comprises the fields of material sciences and cell biology. In general, scaffold materials such as gelatin, collagen, alginate, or synthetic polymers and cardiac cells are utilized to reconstitute tissue-like constructs in vitro. Ideally, these constructs display properties of native myocardium such as coherent contractions, low diastolic tension, and syncytial propagation of action potentials. To be applicable for surgical repair of diseased myocardium engineered tissue constructs should have the propensity to integrate and remain contractile in vivo. Size and mechanical properties of engineered constructs are critical for surgical repair of large tissue defects. Successful application of tissue engineering in men will depend on the utilization of an autologous or nonimmunogeneic cell source and scaffold material to avoid life long immunosuppression. This review will give an overview of recent approaches in cardiac tissue engineering and its first applications in vivo. We will discuss materials and cell sources for cardiac tissue engineering. Further, principle obstacles will be addressed. Cardiac tissue engineering for replacement therapy has an intriguing perspective, but is in its early days. Its true value remains to be thoroughly evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据