4.7 Article

Thermodynamic effect of elastic stress on grain boundary segregation of phosphorus in a low alloy steel

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 647, 期 -, 页码 172-178

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.106

关键词

Grain boundaries; Segregation; Elastic stress; Thermodynamics; Chemical potential; Molar volume

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation [CHN/1133393]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2152021]
  3. Fok Ying Tong Education Foundation [141043]
  4. Aero-Science Fund [20145374001]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560888]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-12-005A2]
  7. Czech Science Foundation [GAP108/12/0144]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grain boundary (GB) segregation of P in 2.25Cr1Mo steel induced by elastic stress shows that the P equilibrium concentration, after reaching the non-equilibrium concentration maximum at critical time, returns to its initial thermal equilibrium level. This finding confirms the interesting phenomenon that the effect of elastic stress on GB segregation of P is significant in kinetics while slight in thermodynamics. Through extending the pressure in classical theory of chemical potential to the elastic stress, the thermodynamic effect of elastic stress on GB segregation is studied, and the relationship between elastic stress and segregation Gibbs energy is formulated. The formulas reveal that the difference in the segregation Gibbs energy between the elastically-stressed and non-stressed states depends on the excess molar volume of GB segregation and the magnitude of elastic stress. Model calculations in segregation Gibbs energy confirm that the effect of elastic stress on the thermodynamics of equilibrium GB segregation is slight, and the theoretical analyses considerably agree with the experimental results. The confirmation indicates that the nature of the thermodynamic effect is well captured. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据