4.6 Article

Early age at onset as a risk factor for poor outcome of bipolar disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 297-303

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00052-9

关键词

bipolar disorder; age at onset; outcome; rapid cycling; substance related disorders; suicide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary aim of our study was to investigate the effect of the age at onset (AAO) of Bipolar Disorder (BP) on the clinical course of the illness. We studied 320 subjects with a diagnosis of BP I or BP 11 who had been previously recruited for a genetic research protocol. All subjects gave their informed consent to participate in the study. Each subject was interviewed using the SCID 1. The main clinical variables were compared between subjects with early (less than or equal to 18 years) and later (greater than or equal to 18 years) age at onset of BP (chi square tests and t-tests for independent samples). In addition, a logistic regression analysis was applied to the variables that were significantly related to earlier onset of BP in the exploratory analyses. We found a significantly earlier AAO in subjects with anxiety disorders (t = 2.44, P = 0.015) and rapid cycling course (t = 3.16, P 0.002). When we compared a number of clinical characteristics between early and later onset of BP, subjects with early AAO had more frequent suicidal ideation/attempts (chi(2) = 12.12, P = 0.002), Axis I comorbidity (chi(2) = 8.12, P = 0.004), substance use disorders (chi(2) = 5.45, P = 0.019) and rapid cycling course (chi(2) = 9.87, P = 0.002). The Odds Ratios associated with these variables were: 1.407 (suicide ideation), 1.646 (Axis I comorbidity), 1.468 (substance abuse), and 2.082 (rapid cycling course). Overall, these results suggest a role of early AAO as a significant predictor of poor outcome in BP and, if replicated, they may have important clinical implications. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据