4.7 Article

Engineered chromosome regions with altered sequence composition demonstrate hierarchical large-scale folding within metaphase chromosomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 162, 期 1, 页码 23-35

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200303098

关键词

mitotic chromosome; large-scale structure of chromatin; scaffold-associated regions; transgenes; chromosome scaffold

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 58460, R01 GM042516, R01 GM058460, GM 42516] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitotic chromosome structure and DNA sequence requirements for normal chromosomal condensation remain unknown. We engineered labeled chromosome regions with altered scaffold-associated region (SAR) sequence composition as a formal test of the radial loop and other chromosome models. Chinese hamster ovary cells were isolated containing high density insertions of a transgene containing lac operator repeats and a dihydrofolate reductase gene, with or without flanking SAR sequences. Lac repressor staining provided high resolution labeling with good preservation of chromosome ultrastructure. No evidence emerged for differential targeting of SAR sequences to a chromosome axis within native chromosomes. SAR sequences distributed uniformly throughout the native chromosome cross section and chromosome regions containing a high density of SAR transgene insertions showed normal diameter and folding. Ultrastructural analysis of two different transgene insertion sites, both spanning less than the full chromatin width, clearly contradicted predictions of simple radial loop models while providing strong Support for hierarchical models of chromosome architecture. Specifically, an similar to250-nm-diam folding subunit was visualized directly within fully condensed metaphase chromosomes. Our results contradict predictions of simple radial loop models and provide the first unambiguous demonstration of a hierarchical folding subunit above the level of the 30-nm fiber within normally condensed metaphase chromosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据