4.7 Article

Benzo(a)pyrene promotes A549 cell migration and invasion through up-regulating Twist

期刊

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 451-458

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-014-1269-8

关键词

Benzo(a)pyrene; A549 cell; Migration; Invasion; Twist

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1204815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) is one of the strongest carcinogens in cigarette smoke, which is an established human carcinogen. Twist, a transcription factor of the basic helix-loop-helix class, is reported to regulate lung cancer metastasis. Evidence has shown that BaP could induce Twist mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line A549 and promote lung adenocarcinoma cell invasion. However, it is unclear whether BaP promotes the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells by Twist modulation. A549 cell was exposed to BaP for different time. MTT assay was applied to assess cell proliferation. Silencing of Twist was done by small interfering RNA. Wound-healing assay was used to evaluate the capability of cell migration. Transwell assay was used to detect the capability of cell invasion. Western blotting and quantitative polymerase chain reaction were used to detect Twist expression. The levels of Twist protein expression and mRNA expression were increased with the treatment of BaP, compared with solvent control. The capability of wound healing of A549 cells was increased in BaP-treated group, compared with solvent control. BaP enhanced the capability of invasion of A549 cells. Twist knockdown could block the migration and invasion of A549 cells induced by BaP treatment. The mRNA levels of Twist were higher in metastatic NSCLC tissue samples than in primary NSCLC tissue samples, and higher levels of Twist mRNA were observed in metastatic NSCLC tissue samples with smoking history than in those with nonsmoking history. BaP treatment could promote the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells by up-regulating Twist expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据