4.5 Article

Temporal development of prograding beach-shoreface deposits: the Holocene of Kujukuri coastal plain, eastern Japan

期刊

MARINE GEOLOGY
卷 198, 期 3-4, 页码 191-207

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00123-3

关键词

AMS C-14 dating; grain size distribution; Holocene; prograding shoreface; ravinement; sequence stratigraphy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prograding beach-foreshore deposits with a basal ravinement bed are recognized from detailed AMS C-14 dating and grain size analyses of Holocene deposits of the Kujukuri coastal plain facing the Pacific coast of Japan. The Holocene deposits are about 20 m thick and consist of an upward-shoaling beach-foreshore succession that has a basal unconformity overlain by a thin layer of relatively coarse sand. The unconformity is a downlap surface, which originated from a ravinement surface. The overall succession was formed by a prograding beach foreshore system during the highstand in sea level of the last 6000 years. Poorly preserved fossil shells, enclosed in the thin layer of coarse sand at the base of the succession, date from the transgressive stage in sea level before 6000 cal yr BP. Grain size distribution patterns are polymodal in the basal sand layer and unimodal in the remainder of the succession. Modal classes of the basal part are fine (3.3-2.6phi), medium (2.3-1.8phi), and coarse (1.2-1.0phi). The fine mode and the unimodal grain sizes define an overall upward-coarsening trend, which correlates with the upward-shoaling succession. In contrast, the medium and coarse modes are restricted to the basal sand, and are interpreted as related to the ravinement process. The thin basal sand layer, an admixture of these modal classes, is interpreted as a type of ravinement deposit preserved during sea-level highstand. No transgressive deposit was preserved on the ravinement surface because sediment supply was so small that the sediment on this surface experienced thorough reworking by storm waves. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据