4.7 Article

New thermodynamic/electrostatic models of adsorption and tension equilibria of aqueous ionic surfactant mixtures: application to sodium dodecyl sulfate/sodium dodecyl sulfonate systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 263, 期 2, 页码 606-615

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00346-1

关键词

adsorption thermodynamic models; binary ionic surfactants; notrideal adsorbed solution theory; sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDSn)

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 54641-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nonideal adsorbed solution (NAS) theory has been formally extended to adsorption at the air/water interface from aqueous mixtures of ionic surfactants, explicitly accounting for the surface potential of the adsorbed monolayer with the Gouy-Chapman theory. This new ionic NAS (iNAS) theory is thermodynamically consistent and, when coupled to a micellization model, is valid for concentrations below and above the mixed cmc. Counterion binding is incorporated into the model using two fractional binding parameters, beta(sigma) for the adsorbed monolayer and beta(m) for the micelles. The regular solution theory is used to model the nonideal interactions within the adsorbed monolayer and within the mixed micelles. New tension data for an equimolar mixture of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDSn) at two salinities fit this model well when mixing is ideal. The total surface densities, the surface compositions, and the surface potentials for the mixed monolayers are calculated. When there is no added salt, at total surfactant concentrations below the mixed cmc, the adsorbed monolayer is enriched in SDSn, but at total concentrations at and above the mixed cmc, the adsorbed monolayer is nearly an equimolar mixture. In the presence of 100 mM NaCl, the adsorbed monolayer is nearly an equimolar mixture, independent of the total surfactant concentration. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据