4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Long-term results and risk profiles of patients in five consecutive trials (1979-1997) with stage 4 neuroblastoma over 1 year of age

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 197, 期 1-2, 页码 11-17

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00076-4

关键词

neuroblastoma; risk factors; chemotherapy; MYCN; bone marrow; survival analysis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the last two decades new diagnostic and therapeutic tools have been utilized to improve the poor survival chances of children with stage 4 neuroblastoma. This study reviews the risk profiles and the long-term outcome of patients from five consecutive German neuroblastoma trials. A total of 96% of all German patients registered at the German childhood cancer registry with neuroblastoma stage 4 over 1 year of age at diagnosis entered one of the trials during 1979-2001. Eight hundred and twenty-eight consecutive children were analyzed retrospectively. In spite of having significantly improved diagnostic tools. like bone marrow superstaging and mIBG scintigraphy the stage 4 incidence did not increase after reaching completeness of the registry (5.4 cases/100,000 children at 1-14 years of age; P = 0.52). The distribution of the primary tumors and of metastases was constant over the periods. The amount of bone marrow infiltration did not change with time. The risk factors lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin and MYCN, and the clinical risk groups 4A, 4B, 4C also remained constant over the trials with a few exceptions for NB97. The 5-year event free survival increased from 0.01 +/- 0.01 (NB79) to 0.14 +/- 0.03 (NB85),0.16 +/- 0.04 (NB82), 0.27 +/- 0.02 (N1390), and 0.33 +/- 0.04 (NB97). The overall survival rates improved similarly from 0.04 (NB79) to 0.44 (NB97). In conclusion, the improved survival was associated with better treatment and not caused by lower risk profiles in stage 4 neuroblastoma patients. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据