4.5 Article

Region-specific effects of acute and repeated restraint stress on the phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 979, 期 1-2, 页码 57-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02866-X

关键词

restraint stress; MAP kinases; phosphorylation; prefrontal cortex; immunoblotting

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-12712] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-60592] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are a family of signal transduction mediators that regulate a host of cellular activities, including cell growth and proliferation, and differentiation and survival, via sequential phosphorylation and activation of a cassette of three protein kinases. MAPKs are also recruited when the brain undergoes synaptic plasticity and remodeling (e.g., during induction of long-term potentiation, learning and memory consolidation). The activities of some of these kinases are altered in response to various acute stimuli such as ischemic insult, visceral pain and electroconvulsive shock. In the present study we used immunoblotting techniques to examine the effects of acute and repeated restraint stress on the phosphorylation state of three MAPKs, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase Erk1/2, c-Jun-N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK) and p38 MAPK, in different brain regions. A single exposure to 30 min of restraint stress-elevated phospho-Erk1/2 (P-Erk1/2) levels in all three brain regions examined (hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex and cingulate cortex), but did not alter the phosphorylation pattern of the other two MAPKs in any region. In marked contrast, exposure to restraint for 11 days (30 min/day) reduced the levels of all three MAPKs, but only in the prefrontal cortex. The results are compared to the reported effects of acute and chronic stress on other biochemical and functional measures. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据