4.8 Article

Postnatal recapitulation of embryonic hedgehog pathway in response to skeletal muscle ischemia

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 479-485

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080338.60981.FA

关键词

genes, hedgehog; ischemia; muscle, skeletal; angiogenesis; tissue regeneration

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-63695, HL-57516, HL-63414, HL-60911, HL-53354, HL-66957] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG-16332] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Hedgehog (Hh) proteins are morphogens regulating epithelial-mesenchymal signaling during several crucial processes of embryonic development, including muscle patterning. Sonic (Shh), Indian (Ihh), and Desert (Dhh) hedgehog constitute the repertoire of Hh genes in humans. The activities of all 3 are transduced via the Patched (Ptc1) receptor. Recent observations indicate that exogenous administration of Shh induces angiogenesis. Here, we studied whether the endogenous Hh pathway, in addition to its functions during embryogenesis, plays a physiological role in muscle regeneration after ischemia in adults. Methods and Results-We found that skeletal muscle ischemia induces strong local upregulation of Shh mRNA and protein. In addition, the Ptc1 receptor is activated in interstitial mesenchymal cells within the ischemic area, indicating that these cells respond to Shh and that the Shh pathway is functional. We also found that Shh-responding cells produce vascular endothelial growth factor under ischemic conditions and that systemic treatment with a Shh-blocking antibody inhibits the local angiogenic response and the upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor. Conclusions-Our study shows that the Hh signaling may be recapitulated postnatally in adult and fully differentiated muscular tissues and has a regulatory role on angiogenesis during muscle regeneration after ischemia. These findings demonstrate a novel biological activity for the Hh pathway with both fundamental and potential therapeutic implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据