4.5 Article

Plasmon-sampled surface-enhanced Raman excitation spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 107, 期 30, 页码 7426-7433

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp027749b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents the first systematic study of the surface-enhanced Raman-scattering (SERS) properties of nanosphere lithography (NSL) derived Ag nanoparticles. Furthermore, it demonstrates the necessity of correlating nanoparticle structure and localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) spectroscopic data in order to effectively implement SERS on nanofabricated surfaces that have narrow (similar to100 nm) LSPR line widths. Using nanoparticle substrates that are structurally well characterized by atomic force microscopy, the relationship between the LSPR extinction maximum (lambda(max)) and the SERS enhancement factor (EF) is explored in detail using the innovative approach of plasmon-sampled surface-enhanced Raman excitation spectroscopy (PS-SERES). PS-SERES studies were performed as a function of excitation wavelength, molecular adsorbate, vibrational band, and molecule-localized resonance or nonresonance excitation. In each case, high SIN ratio spectra are achieved for samples with an LSPR Am,,x within a similar to120-nm window that encompasses both the excitation wavelength and the scattered wavelength. These results unambiguously demonstrate a systematic approach to the optimization of SER spectra on nanoparticle substrates with large interparticle spacings and consequently, weak or no electromagnetic coupling. In fact, this work demonstrates the largest SERS, EF > 1 x 10(8), and SERRS, EF > 7 x 10(9), enhancement factors measured to date on nanostructured substrates. The observation that EFSERRS/EFSERS similar to 40 and E-RRS/EFPre-RRS similar to 40 in the Fe(bpy)(3)(2+) system illustrates that this adsorbate, with its molecule-localized electronic transition, does not damp the nanoparticle-localized LSPR and that the SERS and RRS effects are strictly multiplicative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据