3.9 Article

Risk of Advanced Papillary Thyroid Cancer in Obese Patients

期刊

ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
卷 147, 期 9, 页码 805-811

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.713

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. intramural faculty startup grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether increasing body mass index (BMI) is associated with more aggressive disease and adverse surgical outcomes in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Design: Retrospective review of a prospective database. Setting: Single academic tertiary care center. Patients: A total of 443 patients older than 18 years who underwent total thyroidectomy for PTC from January 1, 2004, through March 31, 2011, were included in the analysis. Patients were organized into 4 BMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) groups: normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), obese (30-39.9), and morbidly obese (>= 40). Main Outcome Measures: Disease stage at presentation, histologic subtype, duration of anesthetic induction and extubation, duration of surgery, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Results: Ages ranged from 18 to 89 years. Greater BMI was associated with more advanced disease stage at presentation (P<.001) and more aggressive PTC histopathologic subtype (P=.03). Morbidly obese patients presented more frequently with stage III or IV disease (odds ratio, 3.67; P<.001). Greater BMI was also associated with longer duration of anesthetic induction (P<.001), increased length of stay (P<.001), and higher ASA class (P<.001). Duration of surgery was not associated with BMI. There was a trend toward larger tumors with increasing BMI (P=.06). Obese BMI was associated with more preoperative vocal cord paralysis due to local invasion (odds ratio, 9.21; P=.001). Conclusions: Obese patients present with more advanced stage and more aggressive forms of PTC. This finding suggests that obese patients should be screened for thyroid cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据