4.3 Article

Focus on research methods: Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta-analyses

期刊

RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 322-333

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/nur.10092

关键词

meta-analysis; research methods

类别

资金

  1. NINR NIH HHS [R01NR07870] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meta-analyses synthesize multiple Primary studies and identify patterns of relationships. Differences in primary study methodological quality must be addressed for meta-analysis to produce meaningful results. No single standard exists for addressing these quality variations. Quality measurement scales are fraught with development and application Problems. Several strategies have been proposed to address quality. Researchers can set minimum levels for inclusion or require that certain quality attributes be present. An inclusive method is to weight effect sizes by quality scores. This allows the inclusion of diverse studies but relies on questionable quality measures. By considering quality an empirical question, meta-analysts can examine associations between quality and effect sizes and thus preserve the purpose of meta-analysis to systematically examine data. Researchers increasingly are combining strategies to overcome the limitations of using a single approach. Future work to develop valid measures of primary study quality dimensions will improve the ability of meta-analysis to inform research and nursing practice. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据