4.6 Article

Influence of copper(II) and magnesium(II) ions on the ciprofloxacin binding to DNA

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 96, 期 2-3, 页码 407-415

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0162-0134(03)00179-X

关键词

ciprofloxacin; magnesium(II) ions; copper(II) ions; DNA-binding; spectroscopic techniques

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of magnesium(II) and copper(II) ions on the binding of ciprofloxacin to double stranded calf thymus DNA was studied by fluorescence emission spectroscopy, ultraviolet- and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The interaction of ciprofloxacin and copper(II) ions was followed by strong fluorescence quenching which was almost unaffected by the presence of DNA. On the other hand, only a slight decrease in fluorescence emission intensity, which was enhanced in the presence of DNA, was observed for ciprofloxacin interaction with magnesium(II) ions. Furthermore, magnesium(II) ions increase the thermal stability of the DNA, while, in the presence of ciprofloxacin, the degree of stabilisation is smaller. In contrast, copper(II) ions destabilise double helical DNA to heat, while ciprofloxacin slightly affects only the second transition of the biphasic melting curve of calf thymus DNA. Magnesium(II) ions at 25 degreesC induce conformational transitions of DNA at concentrations of 1.5 mM and 2.5 M, as monitored by CD. On the other hand copper(II) ions induce only one conformational transition, at a concentration of 12.7 muM. At higher concentrations of copper(II) ions (c>700 muM) DNA starts to precipitate. Significant changes in the CD spectra of DNA were observed after addition of ciprofloxacin to a solution containing DNA and copper(II) ions. but not to DNA and magnesium(II) ions. Based on our spectroscopic results, we propose that copper(II) ions are not directly involved into ciprofloxacin binding to DNA via phosphate groups as it has been suggested for magnesium(II) ions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据