3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Alterations in corneal stromal dendritic cell phenotype and distribution in inflammation

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 121, 期 8, 页码 1132-1140

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.121.8.1132

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01-EY-12963] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The normal corneal stroma is endowed with large numbers of resident dendritic cells (DCs). The purpose of this study was to examine the phenotype and distribution of these cells in inflammation. Methods: Normal and inflamed murine corneas were excised at different time points and immunofluorescence staining with multiple antibodies was performed by confocal microscopy on whole-mounted corneal stromas to characterize and evaluate the distribution of DCs in inflammation. Results: CD11c(+)CD11b(+) myeloid DCs were present throughout the anterior stroma, In the periphery of the normal cornea, nearly one half were major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II(+)CD80(+)CD86(+), while they were uniformly MHC class II(-)CD80(-)CD86(-) in the center. In inflammation, in addition to a significant increase in the number of DCs, a majority up-regulated their expression of MHC class II, CD80, and CD86, indicating their state of maturation. The up-regulation of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules on DCs was seen as early as 24 hours after induction of inflammation or transplantation. In addition to the CD11c(+)DCs in the anterior stroma, a CD11c(-)CD11b(+) population of monocytes/ macrophages was present almost exclusively in the posterior stroma of the cornea. These cells were found throughout all layers of the stroma, and in increased numbers, after induction of inflammation. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates, for the first time, the phenotypic changes and distribution of resident stromal DCs in corneal inflammation. Clinical Relevance: These novel data suggest that the cornea is capable of participating in immune and inflammatory responses by virtue of its own heterogeneous population of DCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据