4.6 Article

The effects of balance training and high-intensity resistance training on persons with idiopathic Parkinson's disease

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00046-7

关键词

balance; exercise; Parkinson disease; rehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess immediate and near-term effects of 2 exercise training programs for persons with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD). Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Public health facility and medical center. Participants: Fifteen persons with IPD. Intervention: Combined group (balance and resistance training) and balance group (balance training only) underwent 10 weeks of high-intensity resistance training (knee extensors and flexors, ankle plantarflexion) and/or balance training under altered visual and somatosensory sensory conditions, 3 times a week on nonconsecutive days. Groups were assessed before, immediately after training, and 4 weeks later. Main Outcome Measures: Balance was assessed by computerized dynamic posturography, which determined the subject's response to reduced or altered visual and somatosensory orientation cues (Sensory Orientation Test [SOT]). Muscle strength was assessed by measuring the amount of weight a participant could lift, by using a standardized weight-and-pulley system, during a 4-repetition-maximum test of knee extension, knee flexion, and ankle plantarflexion. Results: Both types of training improved SOT performance. This effect was larger in the combined group. Both groups could balance longer before falling, and this effect persisted for at least 4 weeks. Muscle strength increased marginally in the balance group and substantially in the combined group, and this effect persisted for at least 4 weeks. Conclusion: Muscle strength and balance can be improved in persons with IPD by high-intensity resistance training and balance training. (C) 2003 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据