4.8 Article

Characterisation of hepatitis B virus X protein mutants in tumour and non-tumour liver cells using laser capture microdissection

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 253-261

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00217-4

关键词

hepatitis B; X protein; hepatocellular carcinoma; laser capture microdissection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: The analysis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein genetic variability and is correlation with liver disease severity have only been addressed, so far, on whole liver extracts. We have studied, therefore, the HBV X protein (HBx) gene sequence in morphologically well-characterised tumour and non-tumour liver cells from patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: Using laser capture microdissection (LCM), we picked up six to eight groups of tumour and non-tumour hepatocytes in serial frozen sections from six patients. After global DNA preamplification followed by HBx-specific polymerase chain reaction, the HBx gene was sequenced in each group of microdissected cells. We also validated the quantification of HBV-DNA in microdissected hepatocytes using HBV Amplicor Results: Heterogeneous mutations in HBx gene were found in distinct cirrhotic nodules and tumour areas from the same patient. Mutations at aa 127, 130 and 131 were frequently detected but there was no distinct point mutation profile between tumour and non-tumour samples. In contrast, deletions in HBx gene, which were found in five/six patients, were more frequent in tumour-derived sequences (6/18) than in non-tumour-derived sequences (1/20). Conclusions: We have shown that LCM provides a direct insight of intrahepatic HBV infection. Using this technique, we demonstrated the persistence of distinct HBx encoding sequences in clonally expanding cells, thus supporting the hypothesis that HBx deletions may be implicated in liver carcinogenesis. (C) 2003 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据