4.7 Article

Quantitative analysis of colorectal tissue microarrays by immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 200, 期 5, 页码 577-588

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/path.1371

关键词

pathological angiogenesis; colorectal neoplasms; digital imaging; immunofluorescence; in situ hybridization; quantitative evaluation; storage phosphor screen; tissue microarrays

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accuracy and reliability of in situ studies may be compromised by qualitative interpretations. Quantitation imposes a greater degree of objectivity, is more reproducible, and facilitates the clarity of definitions. The aim of this study was to validate the utility of laser imaging systems for the in situ quantitative analysis of gene expression in tissue microarrays. Immunofluorescence was employed to quantify the expression of the tumour suppressor p53, a marker of proliferation (Ki67), an endothelial cell marker (CD31), and the mismatch repair proteins human Mut L homologue 1 and human Mut S homologue 2 in an arrayed series of colorectal tissues (n = 110). Quantitative data on this panel of antigens were compared objectively with qualitative scoring of immunohistochemical chromogen deposition. In addition, the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, placental growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and c-Met mRNA was quantified by phosphor image analysis of in situ hybridization reactions. The quantified data on p53, Ki67, and CD31 expression were significantly associated with the pathologist's score (P less than or equal to 0.001). While hepatocyte growth factor and placental growth factor were not up-regulated, c-Met expression was increased up to 2.5-fold and the median VEGF-A expression was elevated 4-fold (P = 0.003) in this series of colorectal tumours. Laser imaging systems are therefore feasible for high-throughput, quantitative profiling of tissue microarrays. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据