4.7 Article

Development of regional flood frequency relationships using L-moments for Middle Ganga Plains Subzone 1(f) of India

期刊

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 243-257

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024770124523

关键词

design flood; GEV distribution; L-moment; return period; ungauged catchment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, screening of the data has been carried out based on the discordancy measure (D-i) in terms of the L-moments. Homogeneity of the region has been tested using the L-moments based heterogeneity measure, H. For computing the heterogeneity measure H, 500 simulations were carried out using the four parameter Kappa distribution. Based on this test, it has been observed that the data of 8 out of 11 bridge sites constitute a homogeneous region. Hence, the data of these 8 sites have been used in this study. Catchment areas of these 8 sites vary from 32.89 to 447.76 km(2) and their mean annual peak floods vary from 24.29 to 555.21 m(3) s(-1). Comparative regional flood frequency analysis studies have been carried out using the various L-moments based frequency distributions viz. Extreme value (EV1), General extreme value (GEV), Logistic (LOS), Generalized logistic (GLO), Normal ( NOR), Generalized normal (GNO), Uniform (UNF), Pearson Type-III (PE3), Exponential (EXP), Generalized Pareto (GPA), Kappa (KAP), and five parameter Wakeby (WAK). Based on the L-moment ratio diagram and | Z(i)(dist)| - statistic criteria, GEV distribution has been identified as the robust distribution for the study area. For estimation of floods of various return periods for gauged catchments of the study area, regional flood frequency relationship has been developed using the L-moments based GEV distribution. Also, for estimation of floods of desired return periods for ungauged catchments, regional flood frequency relationship has been developed by coupling the regional flood frequency relationship with the regional relationship between mean annual maximum peak flood and catchment area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据