4.3 Article

Spatial heterogeneity in the herbaceous layer of a semi-arid savanna ecosystem

期刊

PLANT ECOLOGY
卷 167, 期 2, 页码 319-332

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023927512590

关键词

geostatistics; Laikipia; pattern diversity; plant community patch structure; topography; ungulate; grazing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite increasing recognition of the role spatial pattern can play in ecosystem function, few studies have quantified spatial heterogeneity in savanna ecosystems. The spatial distribution of herbaceous biomass and species composition was measured across three scales in a semi-arid savanna in central Kenya, and patterns were related to environmental variables at different scales. Herbaceous biomass declined across a rainfall gradient and from upper to lower topographic positions, but variation within a site (across 5-50 m) was similar in magnitude to among-site variation associated with rainfall and topography. Geostatistical analyses showed that patchiness at scales of 5-25 m explained 20% of total variation in herbaceous biomass. This pattern arose from the presence of both 5-10-m diameter patches containing high herbaceous biomass (>170 g m(-2)) and 5-10-m diameter patches characterized by nearly bare soil surfaces (<40 g m(-2)). Patch structure was contingent on topography, with larger bare patches at ridgeline and upper hillslope positions. Grass species distributions showed the greatest degree of patch structure and species turnover across distances of 5-45 m. Additional community variation was associated with topography, with minimal variation in species composition across the rainfall gradient. Pattern diversity significantly exceeded levels reported for four other grassland ecosystems, suggesting fundamental differences in local processes generating spatial pattern. It is hypothesized that heterogeneously distributed grazing pressure, interacting with the distribution of shrub canopies, is an important factor generating such high levels of small-scale patch structure in this savanna.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据