4.5 Article

Impact of psychological and endocrine factors on cytokine production of healthy elderly people

期刊

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 124, 期 8-9, 页码 887-895

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-6374(03)00148-9

关键词

ageing; immunosenescence; psychological stress; psychoneuroimmunology; cytokines; hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human ageing has been associated with immunological changes including blunted T-cell responses and increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Here, we investigated the role of psychological and endocrine factors in the production of proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin (IL)-6) as well as soluble IL-2Ralpha, associated with T-cell activation. Forty-six elderly subjects (60-91 yrs) and 33 young adults (20-40 yrs) were recruited accordingly the SENIEUR protocol. The emotional status was measured by structured clinical interviews. Salivary cortisol levels (9, 12 and 22 h) and serum dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) were assessed by radioimmunoassays. The elderly were more stressed, depressed and anxious than the young subjects. Cortisol levels were increased whereas DHEA levels were significantly reduced in the elderly. Both groups showed equivalent production of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as soluble IL-2Ralpha. Psychological scores were positively correlated to evening cortisol levels and negatively correlated to morning DHEA levels. No relationships were noted between psychological factors and cytokines studied. However, evening cortisol levels were found positively correlated to TNF-alpha and sIL-2Ralpha levels. These data indicate that healthy ageing is associated with significant distress and activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Our data also suggest that there are complex psychoneuroendocrine relationships involved with cytokine production during ageing. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据