4.5 Article

Heterogeneity and regulation of cellular prion protein glycoforms in neuronal cell lines

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 542-548

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02777.x

关键词

biological regulation of prion; mouse; neuronal cell lines; N-glycosylation; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The normal cellular prion protein is a small sialoglycoprotein highly expressed in neurons, the physiological function of which is largely unknown. Due to extensive N-glycosylations with a wide range of oligosaccharides, the prion protein displays a complex glycosylation pattern that could be of relevance for its function. The cellular prion protein patterns in adult mouse and rat brain, and in neuronal cell lines, appeared highly heterogeneous, as distinct levels and glycoforms of cellular prion protein were revealed by immunoblotting of corresponding samples. Amongst neuronal cell lines, mouse N2a neuroblastoma cells expressed low levels of endogenous prion protein. Mouse hypothalamic GT1-7 cells and rat pheochromocytoma PC-12 cells expressed highly glycosylated forms of cellular prion protein that were found neither in adult mouse and rat brain, nor in mouse brain during development. In contrast, rat B104 neuroblastoma cells abundantly expressed N-glycosylated cellular prion protein forms similar to those observed in mouse and rat brain. In all these cell lines, the prion protein was normally exported to and expressed at the outer cell membrane. Our results suggest that B104 cells may represent an appropriate cell model to investigate the physiological role of cellular prion protein in further detail as they highly express the normal 'brain-like' cellular prion protein glycoforms. In addition, we observed that the various prion glycoforms in B104 cells were tightly regulated both as a function of cell density and during neuronal differentiation, implying a potential role of cellular prion protein in cell-cell interactions and differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据