Persistence of conidia of Metarhizium anisopliae in sugarcane fields:: Effect of isolate and formulation on persistence over 3.5 years

Metarhizium anisopliae is being used in Australia as a biopesticide for control of sugarcane whitegrubs in soil. The field persistence in sugarcane soil of two isolates of M. anisopliae each in four formulations was tested by mixing the formulation with soil which was then placed in PVC rings and buried in sugarcane fields. The two isolates used were FI-1045, M. anisopliae var. anisopliae , the active ingredient in BioCane(TM) currently used for greyback canegrub control, Dermolepida albohirtum (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae), and FI-147, M. anisopliae var. lepidiotum , being tested as a biopesticide for Lepidiota spp. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) and other species of canegrub. The four formulations were rice granules (as in BioCane(TM)), a wettable powder derived from conidia screened from the rice granules, conidia off rice suspended in water and conidia produced on agar plates, dried, and then mixed with water for adding to soil. FI-1045 was tested at three different sites in north Queensland with a range of soil types and climatic conditions while FI-147 was tested at three similarly diverse sites in southern Queensland. The PVC rings were destructively sampled every 6 months for 3.5 years and the number of viable conidia remaining determined by plating onto a selective medium. The exponential decay was determined. Monthly decay rates ranged from 0.0309 to 0.0835 (mean 0.0512). A small proportion of conidia survived the 3.5 years at all sites and all formulations. Overall, isolate FI-147 persisted better than FI-1045, but was used at the more Southerly sites. Rainfall and soil type had negligible effects on persistence. The agar-produced FI-147 conidia declined most slowly, while the two rice-produced but water-formulated conidia gave similar results. Isolate FI-1045 survived best as the BioCane(TM) formulation and this rice granule formulation was almost as persistent as the agar conidia with FI-147. A small proportion of conidia, in some formulations and at some sites, were recovered from immediately below the rings. This movement was thought to be due to activity of earthworms or mites. The results suggest that 3 years would be the maximum period for a BioCane(TM) formulation to provide some level of infection in the target pest unless augmented by conidia from infected grubs. The effectiveness of these new conidia may be reduced due to their highly aggregated distribution.