4.3 Article

Decreased lysophosphatidylcholine/phosphatidylcholine ratio in cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION
卷 110, 期 8, 页码 949-955

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-003-0007-9

关键词

phospholipids; phosphatidylcholine; lyso-phosphatidylcholine; linoleic acid; arachidonic acid; subjective memory complaints; Alzheimer's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Choline containing phospholipids are essential for the integrity of the cell membrane. Minor changes in the lysophosphatidylcholine (lyso-PC)/phosphatidylcholine (PC) ratio may lead to neuronal damage and cell loss. Several studies have shown protein and lipid oxidation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) affected brain regions. Amyloid-beta peptides may induce free-radical oxidative stress which normally is counteracted by anti-oxidant defense mechanisms. We hypothesize that oxidation may lead to changed concentrations of choline containing phospholipids in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients, because of the susceptibility of the unsaturated acyl-chains of PC for oxidation. PC and lysoPC were determined in CSF of AD patients (n=19) and subjects with subjective memory complaints without dementia (n=19) by tandem mass spectrometry. No differences in total PC concentrations were observed between both study groups. Furthermore, we could not demonstrate different concentrations of PC species containing linoleic acid and PC species containing arachidonic acid. Interestingly, lyso-PC concentrations tended to be lower while the lyso-PC/PC ratio was significantly decreased in CSF of AD patients compared to controls (0.36% versus 0.54%; P=0.017). A comparable decrease was found for the lyso-PC/PC ratio for PC containing linoleic acid (P=0.022) or arachidonic acid (P=0.010), respectively. The lower lyso-PC/PC ratio in CSF of patients with AD may reflect alterations in the metabolism of choline-containing phospholipids in the brain in AD, and suggests that PC species containing linoleic acid or arachidonic acid are equally involved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据