4.5 Article

Intracellular conversion of irinotecan to its active form, SN-38, by native carboxylesterase in human non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 187-198

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5002(03)00223-X

关键词

CPT-11; SN-38; SN-38G; human lung cancer; carboxylesterase; topoisomerase I inhibitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anticancer agent irinotecan (CPT-11) is a prodrug converted to its active form, SN-38, by human carboxylesterase (hCE) and the SN-38 is further metabolized to its inactive form, SN-38G. We investigated the expression of hCE in human lung cancer cells as well as the ability of these cells to convert CPT-11 to SN-38 using surgically resected tumor samples and cultured cell tines. SN-38 was 40- to 3000-fold more toxic to lung cancer cell lines than CPT-11, which acted more time-dependently than SN-38. Although human lung cancer cells expressed hCE in the cytoplasm, hCE expression levels in cancer cells were not correlated with their drug sensitivities. Although intracellular CPT-11 and SN-38 levels continuously increased within 60 min of CPT-11 exposure, SN-38 levels in cells exposed to SN-38 decreased. Cells with the ability to metabolize SN-38 to SN-38G were more resistant to extracellular SN-38 than cells lacking the ability. Of 25 squamous cell carcinomas, 15 were strongly positive for hCE and six were negative. Of 25 adenocarcinomas, four were strongly positive for hCE and 16 were positive, while five were negative. Thus, 70% of non-small cell lung cancers expressed hCE. From these results, we conclude that human Lung cancer cells expressed the enzyme which can convert CPT-11 to SN-38 and that intracellular SN-38 converted from CPT-11 may act as a chemotherapeutic agent together with SN-38 absorbed from the outside and augment the dose intensity of SN-38. Therefore, to assess the effects of CPT-11 prior to chemotherapy, it is important to check if lung cancer cells express hCE. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Ail rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据