4.4 Article

Role of feedforward control of movement stability in reducing slip-related balance loss and falls among older adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 755-762

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01118.2002

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01AG-16727] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human upright posture is inherently unstable. To counter the mechanical effect of a large-scale perturbation such as a slip, the CNS can make adaptive adjustments in advance to improve the stability of the body center-of-mass (COM) state (i.e., its velocity and position). Such feed-forward control relies on an accurate internal representation of stability limits, which must be a function of anatomical, physiological, and environmental constraints and thus should be computationally deducible based on physical laws of motion. We combined an empirical approach with mathematical modeling to verify the hypothesis that an adaptive improvement in feedforward control of COM stability correlated with a subsequent reduction in balance loss. Forty-one older adults experienced a slip during a sit-to-stand task in a block of slip trials, followed by a block of nonslip trials and a re-slip trial. Their feedforward control of COM stability was quantified as the shortest distance between its state measured at seat-off ( slip onset) and the mathematically predicted feasible stability region boundary. With adaptation to repeated slips, older adults were able to exponentially reduce their incidence of falls and backward balance loss, attributable significantly to their improvement in feedforward control of stability. With exposure to slip and nonslip conditions, subjects began to select optimal movements that improved stability under both conditions, reducing the reliance on prior knowledge of forthcoming perturbations. These results can be fully accounted for when we assume that an internal representation of the COM stability limits guides the adaptive improvements in the feedforward control of stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据