4.6 Article

Symptoms of wheeze and persistent cough in the first year of life: Associations with indoor allergens, air contaminants, and maternal history of asthma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 158, 期 3, 页码 195-202

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg148

关键词

allergens; cockroaches; cough; dust; fungi; infant; nitrogen dioxide; respiratory sounds

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES07456, ES05410] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a cohort of 849 infants with an asthmatic sibling, the authors examined the relations of exposure to allergens (dust mite, cockroach, cat, and dog), nitrogen dioxide, and mold with symptoms of wheeze and persistent cough in the first year of life (1998-2000). Among infants whose mothers had physician-diagnosed asthma, neither dust mite allergen nor dog allergen was associated with either symptom. Exposure to cockroach allergen (Bla g 1 at greater than or equal to2 U/g) modestly increased the risk for wheeze (odds ratio (OR)=1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94, 3.71), and exposure to cat allergen modestly decreased the risk (OR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.03). Among infants of mothers with no asthma history, exposure to gas stoves (OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.15) and wood-burning stoves (OR=2.09, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.91) increased the risk of persistent cough. Similarly, measured nitrogen dioxide concentration was associated with persistent cough (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.40). Persistent mold affected both infants of mothers with asthma (for wheeze, OR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.27, 4.07; for cough, OR=1.83, 95% CI: 1.04, 3.22) and infants of mothers without asthma (for cough, OR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.31). Reported exposure was confirmed by an association of measured fungi with wheeze (OR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.49). This appears to have been the first study to measure all of these home exposures (indoor allergens, nitrogen dioxide, fungi) and to prospectively measure the frequency of infant wheeze and persistent cough.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据