4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Is low monocyte HLA-DR expression helpful to predict outcome in severe sepsis?

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1245-1252

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1686-2

关键词

sepsis; prognosis; HLA-DR; monocyte; GM-CSF; compensatory inflammatory response syndrome (CARS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) expression has been reported to be an indicator of poor survival in critically ill septic patients. We assessed its usefulness as a prognostic indicator in order to identify possible interventions to normalise HLA-DR expression in those patients with lowered monocyte HLA-DR. Design: HLA-DR expression was measured on separated monocytes of septic patients, using flow cytometry, and HLA-DR upregulation was measured by the same techniques after ex vivo stimulation with granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). APACHE II score, age, sex and outcome were determined for all patients. Setting: A single-centre study at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital in a medico-surgical 13-bed intensive care unit. Patients and participants: All septic patients (n=70) fulfilling the criteria of the ACCP for the diagnosis of sepsis were recruited for the study with informed consent from day 1 of diagnosis of sepsis and monocyte HLA-DR expression measured on 3 consecutive days. Patients were excluded from the study if they were on immunosuppressive therapy. Normal healthy volunteers (n=45) were included. Results: Low monocyte surface expression and median fluorescence density HLA-DR expression was not associated with a high mortality. High APACHE II scores were not correlated with low HLA-DR expression. However, in those patients where HLA-DR expression was lowered, this could be restored ex vivo by GM-CSF. Conclusions: In the group of septic patients under study, HLA-DR was not a useful prognostic marker of outcome. We did not find a higher mortality in the group of patients who had low expression. These findings are contradictory to some previously reported findings, and the possible reasons are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据