4.6 Article

Calcium-dependent protein interactions in MUC5B provide reversible cross-links in salivary mucus

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 31, 页码 28703-28710

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M304632200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The macromolecular organization within saliva was investigated by tracer diffusion measurements of fluorescent polystyrene microspheres by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching using a confocal microscope (confocal-FRAP). There was a concentration-dependent reduction in microsphere diffusion; this was much greater in the presence of calcium (10 mM) and was reduced by the addition of EGTA (10 mM). These effects on tracer diffusion showed that native saliva contained a macromolecular organization that was sensitive to free calcium concentrations. This was supported by a major increase in the weight average molecular weight of the high molecular weight mucin fraction in saliva (10-62 x 10(6)) and an increase in intrinsic viscosity of saliva (733 to 1203 ml/g) both caused by calcium. Analysis of the change in tracer diffusion in saliva showed a 20-fold increase in the apparent pore size (from 130 nm in 10 mM CaCl2 to 2600 nm in 10 mM EGTA at physiological concentration). The effect was specific for calcium and was unaffected by up to 2 M NaCl. The calcium binding activity was contained in a high buoyant density fraction of saliva excluded from Sepharose CL-2B. Calcium binding to this fraction gave an approximate K-d of 7 x 10(-6) M, and the binding was irreversibly destroyed by treatment with 6 M guanidinium chloride and by mild reduction, suggesting it to be to a protein site. This fraction of saliva was shown to contain MUC5B as the single major protein species by positive ion electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. The results suggested that oligomeric MUC5B in saliva is assembled into much larger linear or branched assemblies through calcium-mediated protein cross-links.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据