4.2 Review

Allergic bronchial asthma: Airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness

期刊

INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 636-643

出版社

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.42.636

关键词

allergic bronchial asthma; airway inflammation; airway hyperresponsiveness; interleukin (IL)-4; IL-5

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The international consensus report on diagnosis and treatment of asthma was published in 1992 (Clin Exp Allergy 22: 1-72). According to the report, asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways in which many cells play a role, including mast cells and eosinophils. Airway inflammation causes various symptoms of asthma which are usually associated with widespread but variable airflow obstruction and causes an associated increase in airway responsiveness to a variety of stimuli. The definition of asthma, provided in this report, is an epoch-making revision of the conventional recognition of asthma based on respiratory physiology and does not contradict the empirical knowledge that asthma responds well to steroid therapy. One reason, which led airway inflammation to be understood as a major factor in the pathophysiology of asthma is the technological advance and the widespread use of bronchoscopes. The use of bronchoscopy as a research tool has markedly improved the understanding of the pathology of asthma. It became also possible to link biopsy findings to autopsy findings in patients who died of asthma. However, it is relatively difficult to repeat a biopsy of the airway mucosal membranes in individual asthmatic patients. Here, animal models of asthma play a significant role. Findings from animal models can provide a clue for the development of new anti-asthmatic drugs. This paper will deal with the paradigm of allergic asthma and focus on recent topics of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5, which seem to play a central role in allergic asthma. The causative relationship between airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness will be discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据