4.6 Article

γ-aminobutyric acid-A receptors contribute to isoflurane neuroprotection in organotypic hippocampal cultures

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 564-571

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068880.82739.7B

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01GM067139-01, R01GM52212-07] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms by which anesthetics such as isoflurane reduce cell death in rodent models of cerebral ischemia remain incompletely defined. Reduction in glutamate excitotoxicity explains some but not all of isoflurane's neuroprotection. Because isoflurane potentiates gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor-mediated ion fluxes and GABA, receptor agonists have neuroprotective effects, we hypothesized that GABA(A) receptors contribute to isoflurane neuroprotection. As a model of cerebral ischemia and recovery, we used rat hippocampal slice cultures. Survival of CA1, CA3, and dentate neurons was examined 2 and 3 days after 1-h combined oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) at 37degreesC. To define the role of GABAA receptors in mediating protection, the effect of 1% isoflurane on cell survival was examined in the presence of the GABA(A), antagonist bicuculline during OGD. Cell death was measured with propidium iodide fluorescence. Isoflurane and the selective GABA, agonist muscimol (25 muM) reduced cell death after OGD to values similar to slices not exposed to OGD, with the exception that muscimol did not reduce cell death in CA3 neurons 2 days after OGD. The GABA, antagonist bicuculline reduced the neuroprotective effects of isoflurane on hippocampal neurons 2 and 3 days after OGD. We conclude that GABA(A) receptors contribute to neuroprotection against OGD produced by isoflurane in the hippocampal slice model. Based on this and other studies, it is likely that neuroprotection produced by isoflurane is multifactorial and includes actions at both GABA, and glutamate receptors and possibly other mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据