4.7 Article

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament resection for dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: results of a randomized, controlled trial

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 310-319

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00613-7

关键词

endometriosis; dysmenorrhea; deep dyspareunia; pelvic pain; laparoscopy; uterosacral ligaments; conservative pelvic surgery; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic resection of the uterosacral ligaments in women with endometriosis and predominantly midline dysmenorrhea. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Two academic departments. Patient(s): One hundred eighty patients undergoing operative laparoscopy as first-line therapy for stage I to IV symptomatic endometriosis. Intervention(s): Operative laparoscopy including uterosacral ligament resection or conservative surgery alone. Main Outcome Measure(s): Proportion of women with recurrence of moderate or severe dysmenorrhea 1 year after surgery. Result(s): No complications occurred. Among the patients who were evaluable 1 year after operative laparoscopy, 23 of 78 (29%) women who had uterosacral ligament resection and 21 of 78 (27%) women who had conservative surgery only reported recurrent dysmenorrhea. The corresponding numbers of patients at 3 years were 21 of 59 (36%) women and 18 of 57 (32%) women, respectively. Time to recurrence was similar in the two groups. Pain was substantially reduced, and patients in both groups experienced similar and significant improvements in health-related quality of life, psychiatric profile, and sexual satisfaction. Overall, 68 of 90 (75%) patients in the uterosacral ligament resection group and 67 of 90 (74%) patients in the conservative surgery group were satisfied at 1 year. Conclusion(s): Addition of uterosacral ligament resection to conservative laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis did not reduce the medium- or long-term frequency and severity of recurrence of dysmenorrhea. (C) 2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据