4.6 Article

Burden of Chinese Stroke Family Caregivers: The Hong Kong Experience

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.027

关键词

China; Rehabilitation; Stroke

资金

  1. Pneumoconiosis Compensation Fund Board of Hong Kong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tang W-K, Lau CG, Mok V, Ungvari GS, Wong K-S. Burden of Chinese stroke family caregivers: the Hong Kong experience. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1462-7. Objective: To ascertain the clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with family caregivers' burden in Chinese patients with stroke in Hong Kong. Design: Cross-sectional design. Setting: Stroke Clinic. Participants: Patients (N=123) from a stroke clinic and their family caregivers. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Predictive factors of family caregivers' burden in Chinese stroke patients in Hong Kong. Caregivers' burden was assessed with the Caregiving Burden Scale (CBS). Patients' and caregivers' sociodemographic data and clinical characteristics were recorded. Physical and psychological conditions were measured and rated with the following instruments: Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Barthel Index, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Mini-Mental State Examination, Lubben Social Network Scale, Modified Life Event Scale (MLES), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and a single question about fatigue. Results: In the univariate analysis, the CBS score had significant correlations with certain characteristics of caregivers (sex, GDS, HADS, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and MLES) and those of patients' (sex, age, education, GDS). Regression analysis revealed that caregivers' GDS and patients' education were the independent correlates of the CBS. Conclusions: The severity of depressive symptoms in Chinese stroke caregivers and patients' education are independent factors associated with the caregivers' burden. Further studies evaluating interventions on caregivers' burden should include the assessment and management of mood disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据