4.5 Article

Modulation of P-glycoprotein transport activity in the mouse blood-brain barrier by rifampin

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.049452

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM61191] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present study was to examine the time course and concentration dependence of modulation of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activity in the blood-brain barrier (BBB) with consequent influence on substrate uptake into brain tissue. Potential P-gp inducers (rifampin and morphine) were administered subchorionically to P-gp-competent [mdr1a(+/+)] mice to induce P-gp expression in brain; the impact of rifampin pretreatment on brain penetration of verapamil also was evaluated with an in situ brain perfusion technique. In addition, the effect of single-dose rifampin on P-gp BBB transport activity was assessed with brain perfusion using verapamil and quinidine as model P-gp substrates. Chronic exposure to rifampin or morphine induced P-gp expression in mouse brain to a modest extent. However, single-dose rifampin treatment increased the brain uptake of verapamil and quinidine in mdr1a(+/+) mice in a dose- and concentration-dependent manner, consistent with P-gp inhibition. Maximum inhibition of P-gp-mediated efflux of verapamil by rifampin pretreatment in vivo (150 mg/kg) was similar to55%, whereas there was only similar to12% inhibition of P-gp-mediated efflux of quinidine at that rifampin dose. Coperfusion of rifampin at a concentration of 500 muM abolished P-gp-mediated efflux of verapamil at the BBB. However, only similar to40% inhibition of P-gp-mediated efflux of quinidine was observed with coperfusion of rifampin, even at a 2-fold higher rifampin concentration (1000 muM). The present studies demonstrate that P-gp function at the BBB can be modulated by rifampin in a dose- and concentration-dependent manner. The degree to which rifampin inhibits P-gp-mediated transport is dependent on the substrate molecule.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据